Saturday 13 November 2010

For agreement’s sake let’s agree to be agreeable, as being disagreeable is quite unacceptable to those without much use for it.

Loyalty must be shown to those who wish to see it—among friends it must be viewed as a kind of flashing.

In the push and shove of mild insinuations there is always room enough for you to be pushed out of the human equation.

There is no individual freedom amongst the crowd, only the pleasingly warm, all persuasive compulsion to do as you’re been told.

As familiarity in social circles encourages contempt, thus the more familiar you are in social circles the more contemptible you can become to nobody in particular.

What you are not you cannot be, but that is no justification for why others should be allowed to tell you exactly what you are without a good enough excuse for doing it.

Nobody has the right to destroy anybody else’s belief in himself, but that won’t stop people from trying. The question then arises as to what will?

Perfect paranoia entails checking out what needs to be checked because you’ve probably been lied to anyway, but just don’t know it yet.

To be able to believe what cannot be proved must still be quite puzzling, but then that can still prove quite satisfying to all those who believe it none the less.

It is true that in seeking through analogy the reality of your predicament your mind will be relieved of mental cramp. Or is that crap?

Undue pressure is an illusion of the present moment, as only what needs to be done is the right thing to do, whatever that may be.

Courtesy needs to have a use beyond courtesy itself to be useful beyond the limits of manipulation; but then it would be useless.

To swiftly recognize how easy it is to be an idiot is not also to recognize it’s impending immediacy present in oneself.

The difficulty in reacting to something is directly reacting to an incorrect assumption, after which you are being compelled to act.